Galapagos Liveaboards

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

seagal

Registered
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Location
Seattle, Washington
# of dives
100 - 199
Hi! I am planning a trip for summer 2011 and I was wondering whether Peter Hughes or the Aggressor is a better option for the galapagos? If the Aggressor the #1 or #2? What experiences have you had with each company? We are planning on traveling in July...any experience in that time? Also...did you bring your own gear? 7mm suit?

Thanks!
 
I was also wondering if anyone knew anything about the humbolt explorer...it is supposedly the newest boat out at the galapagos. Looks pretty nice.
 
Hi! I am planning a trip for summer 2011 and I was wondering whether Peter Hughes or the Aggressor is a better option for the galapagos? If the Aggressor the #1 or #2? What experiences have you had with each company? We are planning on traveling in July...any experience in that time? Also...did you bring your own gear? 7mm suit?
Personally, I preferred my Galapagos Aggressor II trip (June) over my Peter Hughes Sky Dancer trip (August). I'd imagine July would be sort of in between June and August and the diving was sublime on both of the trips.

While I preferred the length of my Sky Dancer trip (10 days versus 7) and the extra days at Darwin with the whale sharks that afforded us, and the boat certainly had a nice main cabin/dining area and dive deck, we had several issues with our cabin, versus a flawless experience on the GA II (plus I liked the food on the GA II a tad better and the guides/DMs as well). That said, our cabin issues on the SD only affected our cabin, and a recent report had similar complaints about the GA II - by the time you go on your trip, it's likely those have all been remedied and you'll either have a flawless experience on either boat, or something new will go wrong! That's the nature of liveaboards.

As for GA I & II, I'd imagine the differences are even more subtle and evanescent than comparing either Aggressor to the SD - the main differences between Peter Hughes and Aggressor that I can think of is that the SD has full liquor included in the cost and may still be offering 10 day trips, whereas the GAs only give you beer and wine (but decent local beer and very decent Chilean wine) but they had a nifty outdoor kitchen where we ate a few meals al fresco. Also, I thought the Aggressor's skiffs were easier to climb back into as they seem to sit lower in the water (or just have lower gunwales) - since getting back into the skiff in the treacherous swells of Darwin is the most effort you'll expend on the trip, that's an important factor!

(I was actually able to compare the skiffs directly, even though my trips were several years apart, since one of our dinghy motors had died on my SD trip when we were at Wolf and the GA that was sharing the site with us that day generously assisted the SD by helping pickup stray divers like me - after days of strenuously hauling myself into the SD dinghy, getting into the GA dinghy was a cinch)

I was OK on both trips with a 5mm FJ, using a hood only in the colder central islands (I hate wearing a hood). Actually, I now recall I put a 3mm core warmer over the 5mm FJ when we dove the central islands in August because that was very frigid (about 58-60 degrees), but I'm guessing July will be a tad warmer. Most divers wore 7mm full suits, some even brought drysuits (neoprene, though, since delicate trilams would get shredded on the rocks). Good kneepads, and more importantly, good thick gloves are also very helpful there.
 
I was also wondering if anyone knew anything about the humbolt explorer...it is supposedly the newest boat out at the galapagos. Looks pretty nice.

There's not much to know about the Humboldt Explorer...., yet. It is still under construction. You can go to Explorer Ventures: Adventures in Live-Aboard Diving to see it's progress. From my understanding, it will be completed in late May/ early June, with cruises beginning in late June. My LDS reserved to charter the boat 1 1/2 yrs ago & the entire trip literally sold out in 1 day. We will be going in Aug./ Sept.. If you'd like, I would be glad to give you a trip report when I get back. I have gone with Explorer Ventures before in the southern Bahamas a couple of years ago & was very pleased with the boat, operations & diving. I was on the Caribbean Explorer I. The boat was older & did show some age, but the only major issue we had was the ice maker did not work. Instead, the crew went ashore every day & bought a few bags of ice, so it was never an issue for us. As for exposure protection, I'm taking both my drysuits & some medium (used to dive the FL caves- 70 degrees) to thick (used at the bottom of a 100 ft deep quarry at 42 degrees) undergarments, as all I have other than those is my 3mm wetsuit. I am also taking a beanie hood & a 5mm hood. I will be using all my own equipment as mine is top of the line gear & I do not trust rentals. The only way I will use rental equipment, is if some of my equipment doesn't arrive by the time we head for the boat.
 
Thank you guys! To Tammy: looks like I will have to let you know how my experience aboard the Humboldt Explorer is like... considering we just booked a trip mid July 2010!!! I am very excited about this and it seems like the boat will be amazing. Maybe it will not have as many problems as the other boats that I have read reviews about? We'll just pray for good weather and lots of whale shark sightings :)
 
To Tammy: looks like I will have to let you know how my experience aboard the Humboldt Explorer is like... considering we just booked a trip mid July 2010!!! I am very excited about this and it seems like the boat will be amazing. Maybe it will not have as many problems as the other boats that I have read reviews about? We'll just pray for good weather and lots of whale shark sightings :)

Sounds like a plan :D. I'd love to hear it!
 
Hopefully, the newer the boat, the better. Any boat eventually wears with time, and maintenance becomes ongoing - usually it takes a passenger with a miserable experience to identify the next maintenance project! Regardless, even if the boat turns out to be a tub (which it won't), your diving experience will be unforgettable. Good weather, well... But you don't need good weather to enjoy the whalesharks, and whalesharks you will see. The weather is always perfect underwater :D
 
I can't comment on the other liveaboards, but we went to the Galapagos with the Agressor last year and the DMs, crew and boat were great. We also booked our hotel reservations through the Agressor which was a disaster and they took no responsibility for it, so if you do go with the Agressor I definitely wouldn't book your hotel through them.
 
Has anyone any experience regarding Galasam International? they have a website at Full Live Aboard Galapagos Islands Diving Cruises that lists liveaboard trips for 2600 USD... this is substantially less than Aggressor or Peter Hughes or the Humbolt Explorer that all lists for around 4-5K.

Any info would be appreciated.
ALoha
 
Has anyone any experience regarding Galasam International? they have a website at Full Live Aboard Galapagos Islands Diving Cruises that lists liveaboard trips for 2600 USD... this is substantially less than Aggressor or Peter Hughes or the Humbolt Explorer that all lists for around 4-5K.

Any info would be appreciated.
ALoha


Just curious about where you came up with $2600? I don't see where they list any prices on their website beyond the extras costs. Galasam owns the Estrella del Mar and quote $3890 for 2010 rates. Having said that, plans are underway for a new Galapagos live-aboard to begin operations in the fall at a lower rate than others.
 

Back
Top Bottom