Saw some earlier threads on this, but hoping for a more up to date set of opinions.
Frameless masks
- Thread starter Rhone Man
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
GrumpyOldGuy
Contributor
I guess the poll is only for those with extreme views 
I have an Atomic Frame-Less, on a scale of 1-10, its a solid 9.
Its comfy and a great field of view. Fit is OK, not perfect as sometimes needs to be cleared once or twice during the dive (I have a narrow face).
I have an Atomic Frame-Less, on a scale of 1-10, its a solid 9.
Its comfy and a great field of view. Fit is OK, not perfect as sometimes needs to be cleared once or twice during the dive (I have a narrow face).
ZzzKing
Contributor
Much like our political system.I guess the poll is only for those with extreme views
I have the same mask, the same skinny face and the same rating. My masks with frames never fit as well and thus get lower marks. Neither is the result of either having or not having a frame.
I voted "best invention since sliced bread" because I don't really like sliced bread that much.
diveprof
Contributor
I'd look more at the quality and view offered by the lenses. I am very impressed with the ultraclear lenses of the Oceanic Pioneer mask though I believe Atomic has a similar offering (doesn't fit my face as well though). Frame vs Frameless is not as important unless it is a backup mask in a pocket.
Similar threads
