- Messages
- 104
- Reaction score
- 0
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
I usually appreciate the journalism of the BBC, and their article about the missing divers who were found after an 18-hour search on the Great Barrier Reef seemed well balanced. Nowhere does the article mention sharks.
But the caption to the accompanying video states, "Couple rescued from shark infested waters after 20 hours".
See the article here: BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Great Barrier Reef divers found
My dictionary gives two definitions for 'infest':
1. to overrun a place in large numbers and become threatening, harmful, or unpleasant.
2. to live as a parasite on or in something.
'Shark-infested waters' makes as much sense to me as 'human-infested London'.
Perhaps we should email the BBC to protest their illogical adjective (and remind them that 'shark-infested waters' needs the hypen). You can send them your complaint from this link:
NewsWatch | Contact us | BBC News website feedback
Tell them we expect better from the BBC.
But the caption to the accompanying video states, "Couple rescued from shark infested waters after 20 hours".
See the article here: BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Great Barrier Reef divers found
My dictionary gives two definitions for 'infest':
1. to overrun a place in large numbers and become threatening, harmful, or unpleasant.
2. to live as a parasite on or in something.
'Shark-infested waters' makes as much sense to me as 'human-infested London'.
Perhaps we should email the BBC to protest their illogical adjective (and remind them that 'shark-infested waters' needs the hypen). You can send them your complaint from this link:
NewsWatch | Contact us | BBC News website feedback
Tell them we expect better from the BBC.