Descents and control

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

TSandM

Missed and loved by many.
Rest in Peace
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
36,348
Reaction score
13,726
Location
Woodinville, WA
I've been chatting with a number of other dive professionals, and it seems like a common theme that, although new divers are impressed with the importance of controlling the rate of ASCENT (to avoid AGE and DCS), all too many are just relieved to be able to get underwater, and never practice any kind of descent control. Given that ear barotrauma is the most common injury in new divers (and have any of you had sore, crackling, or muffled ears after an early dive?), it seems as though some tips on controlling descents would be useful.

I know that, when I was a new diver, just getting under the surface was a huge challenge. Like many, I wasn't underweighted; I was under-techniqued. I didn't balance well at the surface, so I kicked constantly. As a result, when I let the air out of my BC, the kicking I was doing was keeping me at the surface. Adding weight to overcome that resulted in too much air in my BC at depth, and very dubious buoyancy control. In addition, I did what I understood of what I was taught -- I initiated my descent by venting my BC and exhaling . . . with the result that, when my head reached the water, I had a desperate need to INHALE, and therefore buoyed myself right back to the surface. If I was successful enough to get down, it was by virtue of being relatively overweighted and not kicking -- and as a result, the minute I got underwater, I began to plummet, often rotating onto my back.

That story illustrates a lot of points about how to do descents better. To begin with, you need to find a way to balance at the surface that doesn't require constant kicking -- either that, or when you decide to initiate a descent, you have to STOP that kicking. This can be done by crossing one's legs, which prevents the kicking motion. A slight bend in the knee at the same time, which often COMES with the leg crossing, will tend to put your fins out behind you. Resistance from the water will then tend to rotate you into a horizontal position as soon as you are just a few feet underwater. This is advantageous, because in this position, you have the greatest resistance to the water in continuing to descend.

Also, if you hold up the inflator hose and begin to vent and INHALE, then when your head reaches the water, you can exhale sharply, and that will continue your descent. This works much better than the other coordination.

Once you are horizontal and descending, you need to continue to exert control of the descent. I found the easiest way to manage this was to remember that each time my ears needed air added to them, my BC or dry suit did, too. It is a VERY good drill, if you have some kind of wall or line to watch while you descend, to arrest your descent every ten feet, just to prove to yourself that you can. In addition, if you do this, you cannot get more than 10 feet from your buddy, even if he is having descent problems of his own. When the two (or three) of you can head down, stop at 10 feet and okay one another, and then continue the descent, you will not leave someone with ear problems behind, and you will not abandon someone with a gear problem that only became apparent underwater (like an LP inflator hose that pops off!).

I think a lot of folks will be very surprised at how difficult it is to control a descent like this -- I know I was, the first time someone asked me to do it! But developing this kind of control will make one a much better buddy, and avoid a great many problems of buddy separation -- and also the anxiety and sometimes barotrauma that occurs when the person left behind is desperate to regain contact with his buddy.
 
I always descend as fast as my ears will allow. I start at the surface and open my tubes before I begin and equalize as needed. Bottom time does start at start of the descent after all. The sooner one gets to the bottom the more real bottom tine one has. I go slow on ascent so as to have more time in the water. I can't recalll the last time controlling a desent was an issue.
 
I too, drop to the bottom and await for my buddy. Only slowing down as my ears require.
Yes, it's totally wrong and I do need to slow down my decent and stay with my buddy.

Old, bad habits from a pi$$ poor instructor are hard to break. But doable! Thanks for the reminder.
 
Another reason learning to free dive is so valuable. It is all about getting down as quickly as possible. I myself typically have no problem descending with my ears, and can point at the bottom and swim straight down without having to pinch my nose or do any other tricks than wiggling my jaw, but have to be very careful when ascending or I have trouble on round two descending. As a team diver I always stay close to my buddies on descent though.

Having also grown up with a swimming pool and attempting to drown ourselves in every way possible, definitely helps with water comfort. Of course surfing helps with being under the water too.
 
The controlled descent seems to be a concept that is rather alien to many recreational divers when they are required to execute controlled descents where they have to descend as a team, meaning they have to stop mid-water and solve any problems that might arise.

The descent is such an important skill that isn't properly taught, besides the usual "clear your ears" and "get your weighting right so that you can descend easily". Descends are the messiest part of the dive where divers "lose each other", and it's also when divers get in trouble, such as ear problems, realizing that there's something wrong with their gear, etc.

Recent events had inspired me to write an article on my blog about this topic, I hope that it'd be helpful to you too. I hope the mods don't mind me posting the link. My Life As A Scuba Instructor: "See you at the bottom!"
 
If you dive solo, it doesn't matter at all how fast you go down (although there is some evidence that narcosis is worse if you go to great depth very fast).

But if you dive with buddies, it may not work to say, "Meet you at the bottom!" Alan's blog post (which was the inspiration for this thread) points out a few issues -- if someone is delayed at the surface in a place with current, you may never meet up or even realize your buddy has drifted away. If you are diving somewhere like Puget Sound, even 20 feet of separation may mean you can never regroup without surfacing.

We did "hot drops" off the boats in Florida, where it was critical to go down as fast as possible. But in other circumstances, being able to control a descent is very useful, and if you have never tried to do it, you may be surprised at how difficult you find it. I think novice divers are mostly better served by learning control; dives where a rapid descent is critical are more advanced, in my view.
 
Well written. Controlled descents are key IMO to the eventual outcome of the dive. If the initial few mins are controlled, the dive is also controlled, fun and safe. If it begins badly, it often spirals in to a right cluster.

edit to add:

Beginner divers should avoid fast descents IME as they tend to blow through their air very quickly. A nefarious guide can effectively limit the dive time simply by dropping the group to x depth and begin swimming. 40mins later, someone is going to be low on gas. Nefarious but effective.

Much better option and one that I strongly advocate is to descend to a shallow depth where possible (ie. not usually possible on wrecks), and spend a minute or so sorting your stuff out: ears, buddy, orientation, camera, adjustment straps etc.
 
Being candid here, the article title from my blog is actual words used by an instructor who later lost his student during the descent, when the surface conditions were pretty rough and the currents are known to be strong at that dive site. Although the targeted depth was 6metres, the student failed to make it. A search was conducted and all they found was his equipment floating at the surface. His body was found a couple of days later. He was a fit and active man who took part in triathlons and plenty of mountaineering. Unless you are able to read the person's mind, you can never tell if they need help, and when they do, would their buddy be close enough to render help quickly?
 
Wreck diving as well as solo diving. We generally use the anchor line to descend and ascend so "see you at the bottom" is doable if the 1st diver has the displine to stay at the anchor after arrival. All last week in NC my insta-buddy and I met at the link where the safety stop line met the anchor line. He was waiting there everytime, worked out very well. I usually arrived at the wreck before him, so I'd adjust my straps, check my camera, while waiting for him.
 
I agree that to little "effort" is spend during training in teaching well controlled ascent/descents and one of the main reason why the quality of diving skill are what they are. I match my descent rate to those within the dive group specifically in recreational settings.

It is not uncommon though to have descents rate of 130-150ft p/min during some of our technical expeditions in familiar/known OW environments.
 

Back
Top Bottom