Deeper dives first?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Crass3000

Contributor
Messages
344
Reaction score
56
# of dives
100 - 199
I think most people have been taught to make your deeper dives first and then do the shallower dives. It seems everybody I have spoke with seems to agree with this. However, when reading 'Deco for Diver's' the author mentions there is no evidence to back that claim up according to all the papers, books, etc that he had used as research. Do you really need to do deeper dives first?

Edit: To clarify I am talking about recreational depths but I don't recall if the author made that distinction.
 
Does anyone know where this "rule" came from ??

My only thought is that doing your deeper dive first allows more time at your max depth, since you have no residual nitrogen loading. Does this allow more time to work through any problems at depth and still avoid a decompression obligation......or is it just a safety "buffer" that was considered good practice before computers gave us much more accurate dive profiles ?
 
Does anyone know where this "rule" came from ??

My only thought is that doing your deeper dive first allows more time at your max depth, since you have no residual nitrogen loading. Does this allow more time to work through any problems at depth and still avoid a decompression obligation......or is it just a safety "buffer" that was considered good practice before computers gave us much more accurate dive profiles ?

In the 1980 PADI OW manual it suggests doing the deeper dive first to allow the maximum time at depth. It however did not have any admonition about doing dives in any order you choose.

In the 1963 "The New Science of SCUBA and Skin Diving", which I trained with initially, had nothing about it at all. It became evident while doing dive planning that you had more bottom time when doing the deepest dive first.

Sounds like this rule had a basis in fact, but has lasted longer than the knowledge surrounding it is taught.



Bob
------------------------------------
A nod, you know, is as good as a wink to a blind horse.
 
My only thought is that doing your deeper dive first allows more time at your max depth, since you have no residual nitrogen loading. Does this allow more time to work through any problems at depth and still avoid a decompression obligation
This is how I understand the "rule"
 
The reason given for this when I got certified in 1990 was that when working the tables for the same 2 dives, you would get more BT with the deeper dive first. So this was seen a good thing for that reason. I think this was interpreted by many that it must therefore be a more conservative or safer way to go, and it took on a life of its own. Even though ops aren't quite as hung up on it in general as you used to see, it's still seems pretty engrained in dive schedules and briefings.

I did run into a place once where they had taken the refuting of the "deepest dive first" thing to heart, and interpreted it to mean it also didn't matter on a single dive - often starting dives shallow and ending deep. Sigh.
 

Back
Top Bottom