diverrick
Contributor
Maybe I am missing something here, so I am looking for clearification on this issue.
I don't dive to DC depths,never have, and don't intend to start, but I have been thinking about part of it, and the charts and tables don't seem to consider this from what I have seen.
I was also wondering on the same thoughts about air integrated computors, VS no AI computors on this same issue.
Here goes:
If two divers go down to... say 100 FSW...(or what ever DC depth you'd like) and diver 1 uses 1 tank of air, and diver 2 (is a air hog) and uses 2 bottles of air, wouldn't diver 2 need more DC time than diver1? This is just an example. I would think that diver 2 has more nitrogen in solution, then diver 1 due to double the air intake.
Also do the AI computers take this additional air usage into consideration? If this is true, then that would mean that AI computers would be a bit safer to use then non AI.
Just asking.
I don't dive to DC depths,never have, and don't intend to start, but I have been thinking about part of it, and the charts and tables don't seem to consider this from what I have seen.
I was also wondering on the same thoughts about air integrated computors, VS no AI computors on this same issue.
Here goes:
If two divers go down to... say 100 FSW...(or what ever DC depth you'd like) and diver 1 uses 1 tank of air, and diver 2 (is a air hog) and uses 2 bottles of air, wouldn't diver 2 need more DC time than diver1? This is just an example. I would think that diver 2 has more nitrogen in solution, then diver 1 due to double the air intake.
Also do the AI computers take this additional air usage into consideration? If this is true, then that would mean that AI computers would be a bit safer to use then non AI.
Just asking.