Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
To be clear about who does what, NTSB will present safety recommendations based on their findings. That's the October 20 hearing, which will be live-streamed and available to the general public. Criminal charges are pursued by other agencies, not NTSB, although those agencies may use NTSB findings in their case.“We have substantially completed our investigation,” said Eric Weiss, an NTSB spokesman. Weiss said that in the coming weeks NTSB staff will make public interviews, research and other investigative materials before the public hearing.
Using a law from in 1800.... How sad.
Trying to find a guilty person all ways necessary to sooth the families grief is also sad. This law is more than 200 years old. It should have been adjusted. If they can't find anything else than to blame them with, and they are using an "obscure law from before the Civil War" it means they don't have much else to stand on.If negligence is proven...what does the age of the law have to do with anything? It sounds appropriate and relevant given what has been released so far.
30+ people dying on a dive boat...THAT is sad.
Trying to find a guilty person all ways necessary to sooth the families grief is also sad. This law is more than 200 years old. It should have been adjusted. If they can't find anything else than to blame them with, and they are using an "obscure law from before the Civil War" it means they don't have much else to stand on.