Check those computers!

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Diver0001

New
Scuba Instructor
Messages
0
Reaction score
6,013
Location
Somewhere
Every now and again Murphy gives me a little tap on the shoulder. Last night was like that so I'll just post about it.

Without going into a lot of detail my buddy and I were engaged in kind of advanced dive that included making stops every few metres on the way to the surface from a certain depth. During this, my buddy started stopping at different depths than I was. I kept telling him to go shallower and he started telling me that I was too shallow. A quick comparison of our gauges showed us that there was a 3 metre (10ft) difference in what his gauges were showing for depth and what mine were showing.

Murphy was teaching us a lesson. We only had two sets of gauges (I had left my dive watch in the car -- duh) and one of them, or maybe both of them, was definately wrong. On a normal dive this is problematic, but we were well over our NDL's and it was little more than problematic. We needed to know for sure which gauges were right.

We solved the problem in this case by letting up a buoy. I have little knots tied in the line on my reel every 5 metres so I could let the string run between my fingers as the buoy was going up and count the number of knots. But that's kind of beside the point.

The point here is that we were somehow lucky that we were engaged in a decompression dive because it made the problem immediately obvious. If we had just been puddlestomping the problem could have gone undetected, maybe for several dives in a row. Given that my buddy's computer was showing too shallow, it would have even been possible for him to get into deco without knowing it.

It's not unheard of for computers to malfunction like this. So learn from my lesson. Make it a habit on every dive to compare depths with your buddy when you have reached your target depth.

R..
 
I'll think about that today and tomorrow when I'm doing cattle herding...er.. safety diving with the shop. My buddy and I have the same computer (different production generation, but that shouldnt make much difference, right!?) so it would be intreresting to see if they register in the same. We'll see how close it is to the guages to.. mine have been within a roughly one foot of one another on the 30' or less dives, Sunday will be 60's... :)
 
When I was using computers I saw this happen MANY times. It wasn't at all unusual for my wifes comuter and mine to read differ by 3 - 8 feet even at shallow depths.
 
My husband and I dive with different computers and we regularly check their readings against eachother, not only on safety stops, but at depth as well. It's always been just for curiosity before, but now after reading your post, we'll do it for safety. Thanks!
 
I tend to make a point of comparing my computer readout to my analogue gauge at various points on a dive to check they agree after witnessing a problem similar to this before.

Its the only reason i still have my bulky console on my kit.
 
Strange this seems to be so common an occurance. I have dived with two different type computers for the past several years, maybe 300 dives, and have never had a difference between the two. It would be logical that if one was to fail the other wouldn't fail exactly the same way, I wonder what is causing your failures?
 
Interesting - and important. Not uncommon for computer depth readings to be different by a few feet at depth. One of the major reasons for comparing readings amongst students on 'Deep' training dives.

I certainly see a foot or two - or sometimes three difference at 60 or 70 feet. But deliberate tracking and monitoring of performance is something I will do more fastidiously from now on.
 
Most computers, when properly calibrated, are accurate to plus or minus 1%. So at 100' you can expect a maximum of 2' difference between two computers if one is reading -1% and the other is reading + 1%. Anything more than that indicates one or both of them may have a problem.

The disclaimer here is that if you are diving somewhere between sea level and 1000-2000 ft. one computer may be reading in feet sea water and the other may be reading in feet fresh water, so the difference may be greater with no error. I had my computer and Uwatec bottom timer disagree by 6' at lake Wazee at 150 ft. due to this effect.

When I deco dive, I always have a redundant source for time and depth. If the two sources of depth information disagree, I can shoot a bag and get a third opinion from the very reliable and low tech marks on the line on my reel or finger spool.
 
A couple of years ago I purchased a new computer and when I took it on its first dive I carried my old analog depth guage and my old computer for comparison purposes. My new computer indicated a depth 18% deeper than the analog depth guage and 8% shallower than my old computer. Needless to say I was quite concerned, I did not know which instrument was right. All of the instruments were calibrated for salt water.

I had the new computer sent back to the manufacturer for testing, and I had the other instruments tested just to find out what was up. The results were that the analog guage and old computers were pretty far off from the actual depth, and the new computer was indicating three quarters of a percent shallower than the actual depth. The new computer was not a problem as the manufacturer indicated that an error of one and one half of a percent was within their manufacturing tolerances and such an error was factored into their decompression model. I choose to add just a little extra conservatism to allow for the error.

The analog guage was not able to be re-calibrated in a cost effective manner so it was destroyed and thrown in the trash. The old computer I gave to my brother who is still a new air hog diver, and dives rather infrequently so he will probably stay that way for years. I did tell him about the error in the computer but he stays shallow and never gets even remotely close to NDL limits, so the depth issue is not a concern. Frankly with the computer reading deeper than actual depth this actually will keep him out of trouble even better.

Your point that multiple instruments can give multiple readings is a good one. I now carry two depth and time instruments on every dive, and I try to check my buddys devices for comparison purposes as well. A small error of a few feet or one meter does not concern me, but errors of 10 feet or 3 meters will have me really look closely at my depth profile. On a planned decompression dive a large error would probably have me thumb the dive. On a recreational multi level dive I would just keep well away from the NDL.

Mark Vlahos
 

Back
Top Bottom