Captured O ring vs rotating crossbar manifolds

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Satori

Contributor
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
Location
NOR*CAL
# of dives
50 - 99
Hey all...I was checking out some OMS manifolds and noticed these two variations. Anyone know of the advantages/disadvantages?
 
Had the OMS rotating crossar manifold originally and it was recalled within 3 mos of my purchase... I now have the captured o-ring version.

Dave
 
I'm not an expert, but as I have heard it, the thinking goes that the barrel-oring design is more likely to suffer impacts (such as with an overhead) gently without causing catastrophic gas-loss.

Also, from a more pragmatic point of view, the isolator crossbar can rotate freely in a barrel-oring design and there is more tolerance in how the manifold fits together.

As a scientifically meaningless datapoint, I had a set of my doubles knocked off of a table at the dive site and they fell to the ground at a bad angle causing one tank to slip. This caused a very noticeable bend in the manifold (to the point where I thought twice about even touching the thing) but absolutely no gas leak. Granted nothing like that kind of impact is likely to happen underwater, but it's nice to know that it can survive that.
 

Back
Top Bottom