Canon 7D Lenses

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

The Tokina 10-17mm wide angle zoom is a common underwater lens. The Canon 16-35 F2.8L and 17-40 F4L are excellent lenses, but not as wide as some like underwater (at least on a cropped-sensor 7D)

Standard close-up models are the EFs-60mm Macro, EF 100mm Macro (both older non-IS and newer IS). The Sigma 50mm macro can also do well for close-up and mid-distance fish shots, but is getting a little short for serious macro work. For short focal length macro you need to get really close to the subject, and most living things don't like that. Also, I hear the Sigma lenses can be a little hit-or-miss when it comes to quality control.

Beyond these common lenses, it would be helpful to know more detail about what you want to shoot underwater or on land.
 
According to Ikelite:

The Canon 16-35 F2.8L "Lens diameter is too large to operate in port system"
So looks like this option is off the table.

The Canon 17-40 F4L "5503.51 is not long enough to add accessory diopters or filters"

So looks like these options are off the table, or do I misunderstand?

I'm looking for a good underwater lens (fish, coral, far and closeup) that can also be useful on land.
 
We used a Canon 10-22mm and Canon 100mm macro on our recent trip. Both seemed to work well but with the crop sensor I think a 60mm macro port is in our future.
 
If I was to buy only once lense it would be the 24-105 L-Series.

However, I dive with the 17-40 L-Series and perfer it landspace photos.
 
If you are using an Ikelite case, yes the 16-35 F2.8L is too big, but you didn't previously indicate that you were using an Ikelite. I regularly use the 17-40 F4L with Ikelite's 6" dome and have never had a problem. I have never had need for an accessory filter underwater. The only accessory filters I ever use are neutral density or polarizers and these are of little use underwater. All the colored filters are easily replaced by post-processing RAW files. Moreover, the 8" modular dome system is a better option for wide angle lenses.

I suspect you will have a hard time finding a single lens that will cover all you want to do. I do like the 24-105 F4L Codiak mentions. It is a good multi-purpose lens. By underwater standards, 24mm on a cropped sensor camera is not wide angle, however.

Edit: it looks like the 14-105 F4L is also too big for Ikelite ports.

According to Ikelite:

The Canon 16-35 F2.8L "Lens diameter is too large to operate in port system"
So looks like this option is off the table.

The Canon 17-40 F4L "5503.51 is not long enough to add accessory diopters or filters"

So looks like these options are off the table, or do I misunderstand?

I'm looking for a good underwater lens (fish, coral, far and closeup) that can also be useful on land.
 
I use the 8" dome with the 17-40... haven't tried the 24-105 but will tomorrow when the camera comes back from cleaning. I don't recall an issue with it in the ike housing regardless of documentation. will check though
 
Here is the list of candidates that I'm looking at.
I sorted them in priority order.
I gave priority to wider angle.
Does anyone have any criticisms on the order I chose?

Canon 10-22 F3.5
Sigma 10-20 F4
Tokina 10-17 F3.5
Tokina 11-16 F2.8
Tokina 12-24 F4
Canon 17-40 F4
 
congrats on your new camera

Is this for topside and underwater, or just underwater?

What subjects are you looking to photograph underwater? Every lens has a different purpose, this will help you select the best lens for your needs. And I'm curious why you didn't place the tokina 10-17mm first (not saying you should have).

scott
 

Back
Top Bottom