Hi All,
I am experienced photographer, been using D/SLR's for a long time, always had point and shoots as I like to carry them instead of an SLR many times.
My SLRs in last 10 years have all been Canon and most point and shoots also Canon due to familiar with menus etc.
Underwater I have only used my Canon compacts, current one is G16 and I use a Meikon housing instead of Canon as I am only at Snorkel depth to a few metres, I wanted to Scuba, but have found my ears (or mainly one) does not like it, even free diving a few metres can be painful, on a good day I may be fine for 5, anyways.....
The G16 does pretty well, it is pretty fast, chose this over a Sony as Macro and stills were what I want from this setup mainly, although it does Video pretty well too it seems.
Been thinking about going to a Canon 70D & putting it in a Meikon housing. Seems with the improvement in the focusing and being able to auto iso a slect range when in manual could be good for varying ambient light scenarios and changes when out, the G16 in the Meikon housing means no practical way to control manual properly for light changes, you can only really pick 2 custom settings, anyway, it is not a huge deal, as it performs well in all creative modes really.
I have of course varied lenses for Canon, the Meikon housing is set for a kit lens (which I would get too for land use with video) but some of my existing primes or zooms may also fit, no gurantees & I will be doing some measuring soon, but if stuck with kit lens, it is likely to be a better outfit than the G16, but, the Meikon housing does not seem to allow using the cameras viewfinder (which may not be practical anway when snorkeling) but then I am concerned about if using the LCD as you do on the G16, is it going to be fast enough to focus or will it be slower than the G16 ?
The other things is, before I go down this path, using cheaper Meikon housings, is there something else that is going to be as good or maybe better than the 70D ? perhaps a Nikon, or an Olympus mirrorless ? The 70D would be very useable for years to come with the other gear I have, so an alternative would have to def be better with the kit lens they come with which is what the Meikons are mainly designed for.
Whats your opinion ?
I am experienced photographer, been using D/SLR's for a long time, always had point and shoots as I like to carry them instead of an SLR many times.
My SLRs in last 10 years have all been Canon and most point and shoots also Canon due to familiar with menus etc.
Underwater I have only used my Canon compacts, current one is G16 and I use a Meikon housing instead of Canon as I am only at Snorkel depth to a few metres, I wanted to Scuba, but have found my ears (or mainly one) does not like it, even free diving a few metres can be painful, on a good day I may be fine for 5, anyways.....
The G16 does pretty well, it is pretty fast, chose this over a Sony as Macro and stills were what I want from this setup mainly, although it does Video pretty well too it seems.
Been thinking about going to a Canon 70D & putting it in a Meikon housing. Seems with the improvement in the focusing and being able to auto iso a slect range when in manual could be good for varying ambient light scenarios and changes when out, the G16 in the Meikon housing means no practical way to control manual properly for light changes, you can only really pick 2 custom settings, anyway, it is not a huge deal, as it performs well in all creative modes really.
I have of course varied lenses for Canon, the Meikon housing is set for a kit lens (which I would get too for land use with video) but some of my existing primes or zooms may also fit, no gurantees & I will be doing some measuring soon, but if stuck with kit lens, it is likely to be a better outfit than the G16, but, the Meikon housing does not seem to allow using the cameras viewfinder (which may not be practical anway when snorkeling) but then I am concerned about if using the LCD as you do on the G16, is it going to be fast enough to focus or will it be slower than the G16 ?
The other things is, before I go down this path, using cheaper Meikon housings, is there something else that is going to be as good or maybe better than the 70D ? perhaps a Nikon, or an Olympus mirrorless ? The 70D would be very useable for years to come with the other gear I have, so an alternative would have to def be better with the kit lens they come with which is what the Meikons are mainly designed for.
Whats your opinion ?