Gadvantage
New
Hi there,
I am an AOW / nitrox diver with around 45 dives to my name so far, and now looking to purchase my first reg set. I have narrowed it down to Atomic Aquatics regs, and after many research hours I find myself conflicted between the ST1 and M1 for a first regulator.
I like the idea of venturing into tec diving, and I see myself entering the world of decompression diving so double tanks / sidemounts etc. somewhere in the next 2-4 years, obviously need to narrow that down but will probably only be able to do this as I gain more knowledge / experience over time.
I live in the Middle East and currently mostly dive tropical / red sea abroad. I don't think cold water dives (sub 10 celsius) are on my horizon. Either way, I will be getting a sealed reg given heavy silt in the UAE.
Basically, I am unsure of whether I should go for (i) the M1 now, or (ii) the ST1 now, and pick up separate tec regs whether M1 or diaphragm regs like the XTX50 at that point in time, and have separate rec and tec reg setups.
Having said that, I guess I can distill my questions down to three key ones:
1. Are there any benefits to diving rec with an ST1 vs an M1 that justify owning the ST1 for rec diving even when I do eventually get into tec, or should I just proceed with an M1 to be able to graduate my regulator to tec and also use it for rec dives then?
2. Is it even sensible to use the same reg for both tec and rec dives, or do most of you tec divers go for separate rec and tec regulator setups? i.e. would you prefer to dive rec with a rec regulator like the ST1, or would you just use one of your tec regs (e.g. the M1 or others)?
3. With respect to the comfort swivel on the ST1 - from what I gather, it appears that for a few people, Atomic Aquatics proprietary take on the SS swivel (comfort swivel) has a leg up on the competition compared to other omniswivel options, albeit being attached to the hose. Does anyone have experience with migrating the comfort swivel to a longer length hose in a cost effective way?
Thanks very much in advance.
I am an AOW / nitrox diver with around 45 dives to my name so far, and now looking to purchase my first reg set. I have narrowed it down to Atomic Aquatics regs, and after many research hours I find myself conflicted between the ST1 and M1 for a first regulator.
I like the idea of venturing into tec diving, and I see myself entering the world of decompression diving so double tanks / sidemounts etc. somewhere in the next 2-4 years, obviously need to narrow that down but will probably only be able to do this as I gain more knowledge / experience over time.
I live in the Middle East and currently mostly dive tropical / red sea abroad. I don't think cold water dives (sub 10 celsius) are on my horizon. Either way, I will be getting a sealed reg given heavy silt in the UAE.
Basically, I am unsure of whether I should go for (i) the M1 now, or (ii) the ST1 now, and pick up separate tec regs whether M1 or diaphragm regs like the XTX50 at that point in time, and have separate rec and tec reg setups.
Having said that, I guess I can distill my questions down to three key ones:
1. Are there any benefits to diving rec with an ST1 vs an M1 that justify owning the ST1 for rec diving even when I do eventually get into tec, or should I just proceed with an M1 to be able to graduate my regulator to tec and also use it for rec dives then?
2. Is it even sensible to use the same reg for both tec and rec dives, or do most of you tec divers go for separate rec and tec regulator setups? i.e. would you prefer to dive rec with a rec regulator like the ST1, or would you just use one of your tec regs (e.g. the M1 or others)?
3. With respect to the comfort swivel on the ST1 - from what I gather, it appears that for a few people, Atomic Aquatics proprietary take on the SS swivel (comfort swivel) has a leg up on the competition compared to other omniswivel options, albeit being attached to the hose. Does anyone have experience with migrating the comfort swivel to a longer length hose in a cost effective way?
Thanks very much in advance.