A questions related to charters and trip insurance. Seemed like the travel forum was the right place.
I chartered a spot to dive the Andrea Doria in July. For those that don't know - this is one of the riskier activities that one can engage in. The wreck in 90 miles out in the Atlantic - so weather is freqently a concern. This charter was for 7 divers. I paid $1750 for what should have been a 12 hour ride to the site, 2 and a half days diving it (with up to 5 opportunities) and a 12 hour ride back. Given the risk - I purchased a trip insurance polity from Travel Guard (AIG).
Weather did not cooperate. On the day we were to leave - the captian decided to delay a day because the weather (seas) were unfavorable. The next day - in the afternoon, the captain announced the charter was cancelled. Later that evening, he decided that the charter was back on, and we left the following morning in rolling seas. We arrived at the site at 4PM in the afternoon, and the captain determined the conditions were not dive-able. At 7PM, the captain cut the mooring line and returned to port. No diving was permitted in the 3 hours we were on site.
I filed a claim with Travel Gaurd, and they asked me a question I had a hard time answering. "What were the value of the dives, versus the value of the rest of the trip delivered." The captain asserted, in a reply to Travel Gaurd / AIG, that his charter delivered $1250 of value in the previously described events - taking us to and from the site. He asserted that the dives were worth $500. This is what Travel Guard would like to pay on the claim.
I may be niave - but I'm not sure that a diving trip with no diving has the sort of value the captain asserted. Not does he (or anyone else) advertise or sell 24 hour boat rides to the Doria. I would assert the value delivered was much less - although I agree the expense for this excursion was obviously high.
For those of you with experience, or with a JD / Esq after your name, is this a disputable claim or did I simply misunderstand the products I purchased.
Thanks,
I chartered a spot to dive the Andrea Doria in July. For those that don't know - this is one of the riskier activities that one can engage in. The wreck in 90 miles out in the Atlantic - so weather is freqently a concern. This charter was for 7 divers. I paid $1750 for what should have been a 12 hour ride to the site, 2 and a half days diving it (with up to 5 opportunities) and a 12 hour ride back. Given the risk - I purchased a trip insurance polity from Travel Guard (AIG).
Weather did not cooperate. On the day we were to leave - the captian decided to delay a day because the weather (seas) were unfavorable. The next day - in the afternoon, the captain announced the charter was cancelled. Later that evening, he decided that the charter was back on, and we left the following morning in rolling seas. We arrived at the site at 4PM in the afternoon, and the captain determined the conditions were not dive-able. At 7PM, the captain cut the mooring line and returned to port. No diving was permitted in the 3 hours we were on site.
I filed a claim with Travel Gaurd, and they asked me a question I had a hard time answering. "What were the value of the dives, versus the value of the rest of the trip delivered." The captain asserted, in a reply to Travel Gaurd / AIG, that his charter delivered $1250 of value in the previously described events - taking us to and from the site. He asserted that the dives were worth $500. This is what Travel Guard would like to pay on the claim.
I may be niave - but I'm not sure that a diving trip with no diving has the sort of value the captain asserted. Not does he (or anyone else) advertise or sell 24 hour boat rides to the Doria. I would assert the value delivered was much less - although I agree the expense for this excursion was obviously high.
For those of you with experience, or with a JD / Esq after your name, is this a disputable claim or did I simply misunderstand the products I purchased.
Thanks,