... it is a fairly well known axiom of observation that the observer taints the observed by the act of observing at some level or another...
...and especially now that I have not only called attention to the fact that observation is happening but have openly invited all to participate in observing the psychological underpinnings of this thread...
I suspect that further posts will be largely shaped by that axiom... and it should be revealing to say the least... for the change in a phenomenon by interaction with the observer can be just as interesting as the phenomenon itself...
So what do you all think?
...and especially now that I have not only called attention to the fact that observation is happening but have openly invited all to participate in observing the psychological underpinnings of this thread...
I suspect that further posts will be largely shaped by that axiom... and it should be revealing to say the least... for the change in a phenomenon by interaction with the observer can be just as interesting as the phenomenon itself...
So what do you all think?