A gas loss non-emergency

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

TSandM

Missed and loved by many.
Rest in Peace
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
36,348
Reaction score
13,723
Location
Woodinville, WA
I am posting this story, which is a tech diving story, not in the cave diving forum but here. I am doing it because I think it illustrates a principle, which is that conservative planning may begin to seem onerous, but is always wise.

Peter and I have been cave diving for years. Shoot, we've been DIVING for years, all over the place and in all kind of conditions and at a wide variety of depths. We've taken a bunch of training to prepare to deal with emergencies, which we have basically never had. It's awfully tempting to stop observing the relatively limiting and annoying restrictions we were taught to respect.

On this particular dive, we were going into a cave new to us. Cave diving is always planned at the very least by the rule of thirds -- you never use more than 1/3 of your gas going in, so you have enough to get a buddy out, or more likely, to deal with anything which delays your exit. This cave, we were diving on double Aluminum 80s, so normally, we would have a 3000 psi fill, and plan to turn around and head home at 2000 psi. But because this cave was deep, we were bringing an additional tank, called a stage. Rules for stage usage vary, but we knew how much of the stage we would use, and how we would account for the needed reserves gas. This is all very simple once you are trained to do it, and we are very familiar with the process.

What was different in this cave was that the profile was going to tend deeper than we usually go. The really interesting and beautiful part of the cave was going to be down around 70 or 80 feet, which doesn't sound that deep until you realize we would have been running about45 minutes of depths averaging 60 feet before we ever got there. If you get out the tables, even an hour at 60 on 32% is a lot, and if from there, you head deeper, you are going to run out of no-deco time very quickly (and remember, everything we did going in, we have to do going out; so 45 minutes at 60 is really 90 if you exit).

So I had done the calculations for 10 minutes of backgas deco, and how much we needed to reserve to do that, and account for having to share gas while doing it, and we had planned our gas around those numbers. But when we got to the 70 foot section, it was SO beautiful . . . We both wanted to go on, and enjoy the cave a little more. Shoot, we weren't racking up that much deco, and we've never had a gas loss problem -- how bad could it be? But I am persistently paranoid, and we turned and headed back.

We picked up our stages and started breathing them, and everything was fine. Shoot, we could have gone a bit further . . . except I see some weird light signals from behind me, and turn around, and Peter is wreathed in bubbles. It looks like his stage reg has exploded, but once he turns it off, it's clear the issue is that a hose has come somewhat unscrewed from the first stage. He shuts the tank off, switches to the regulators attached to the tanks on his back (where he has tons of gas) and once the hose is depressurized, he is able to screw it back in until it doesn't leak. Total gas loss is 100 psi; we have plenty to do the deco we have incurred.

What would have happened if we had gone further? What would have happened if he had not been able to handle the malfunction so neatly?

Lessons learned: Plans are conservative for a reason. Problems you haven't had are only that -- they are not problems you can't, or are never going to have. Gas is time, and sometimes you need time.

During our 10 minutes of deco, I had a lot of time to reflect on how much I owe to the people who taught me to be careful.
 
Interesting post, especially as I am currently taking my first technical courses and learning some of these things. Thanks!
 
I do wrecks, not caves, but a couple of 80's and a stage doesn't seem like a lot of gas for 90 minutes in a 70' overhead.

vPlanner puts that at 206 CuFt for a 0.7 SAC, which is just about the entire usable contents of 3 AL 80s. Your SAC is probably lower, but I never count on being completely unstressed when things might go badly.

If you lost a tank, was there enough gas to get you both out safely? How much gas did you have left back on the boat/shore?

What would have happened if we had gone further? What would have happened if he had not been able to handle the malfunction so neatly?

One or more of you would be bent or dead.

flots
 
Last edited:
An important story. Thank you for posting it here.
It stands a better chance of being seen by the wider recreational dive community where (I hazard to guess) there is a greater temptation to 'bend the rules' because the environments are considered more forgiving.
To relatively inexperienced divers, I explain conservative practice by applying an analogy with wearing or using seatbelts. We all WEAR seatbelts, but hopefully rarely USE them!
It is just not clever to come up at the end of a dive with less gas than planned or slipping into an unplanned deco obligation, but all too frequently these episodes are taken lightly and often dismissed. It only takes the coincidence of more than one near-miss event to quickly develop into a life threatening one.
We are probably some way from the routine recording of near-misses as practiced in the airline industry or medicine (even if imperfect!). But individuals can do this themselves and, with a bit of reflective practise, lead themselves to safer diving. For example, I keep a record of times when I have a fast ascent detected on my dive computer and use it to beat myself up every now and again!
 
Just remember that almost all of the "rules" of diving have evolved over the years from the deaths of previous divers. Please do not make the same mistakes that other have already done and paid with their lives.

Not that I really care about the death of any individual that much, I do care about the effects upon the entire diving community.

Thanks for having the courage to post a true life event and I am glad that it ended well for all.
 
It is just not clever to come up at the end of a dive with less gas than planned or slipping into an unplanned deco obligation, but all too frequently these episodes are taken lightly and often dismissed.

Real gas planning isn't stressed a lot in Open Water because it's not actually required by any OW standards I'm aware of, and "unplanned deco" should be regarded as a major screwup.

As long as there's no overhead and no deco, bad gas planning in OW is generally only cause for embarrassment, not a funeral.

Once you have a deco obligation or are inside something, the consequences for screwing up are tremendously elevated. This is lost on a lot of OW divers who want to go inside stuff without sufficient training, equipment and planning.

flots.
 
Another important lesson, besides the rules and emergency procedures is to maintain your gear so that potential accidents are unlikely to occur in the first place. I'm glad everything turned out OK. It's a good reminder for everyone to check the condition of their hoses, including pulling any hose protectors back before their next dive.
 
Very nice thread TsandM and it happened to me today. We were at Lake Jocassee and several of us were doing of our trimix class dives. We were, between dives, supposed to be getting a top off and some how my tanks were underfilled. Twin 104s with a 50 with deco. Tanks were filled to 2300 and deco tank was at 1200. Not a problem. The dive was just to 140' with a down line to the graveyard with a bottom time of 18 minutes. The dive went perfect but the ascent was a different story. Based on the two computers I was using, first stop was at 76' for 1 minute. Next stop was 46' x 1 min. I got my deco reg out, turned the valve on and got a free flow. Shut it down and tried it again. Same situation...so there goes the deco gas. (No feathering....I use Poseidon regs). Now I am faced on doing the entire deco with a total run time of 54 mins. Thank God that it was not a hypoxic mix (but still had several friends with additional gas). Stuff happens and usually at the worst time.
 
Interesting incident. Any opinions regarding a simple "twist test" on our reg hoses that could be a useful pre-dive checkout procedure?

I do not recall reading about this type of failure before. Maybe the twist would cause more wear & tear than the test is worth?
 

Back
Top Bottom