... the two words that I was hoping to see that were absent were "we're sorry". Seriously, all this could have been avoided had any member of her staff had just said "we're sorry you injured your ears".
I think that's a fact of modern life. It may be seen or worse, misused, as an admission of guilt by an unscrupulous party with an axe to grind.
In your initial posts, it seemed very clear that you were accusing the dive center for causing your injuries - through negligence and unprofessional conduct. If I were the subject of such accusations, I would be
very careful about what I said to the accuser also.
You made accusations on a global public forum
and sent them to PADI. It's not unrealistic to assume that you may also have been considering legal action.
I do understand how better communication from the dive shop
may have averted some misunderstandings
but I've also been on this board, and in this industry, long enough to have seen more than a few undeserved outbursts/assassinations on the behalf of customers - who also failed to fully communicate with the dive shop concerned, in an appropriate way, at an appropriate time.
If your concern with the shop was over 'customer service', then you certainly failed to make that clear in your initial posts. I, like many people, saw those posts as a very critical and damaging report about the safety of the dive shop, the lessons and duty-of-care they provided.
Maybe, your staff should have shown prudence and said "you're not diving with us until your ears clear up" ?!
Again, I see a pattern that reflects the abdication of personal responsibility. If you're ears were sore, then you choose not to dive. YOU choose. The dive centre has no real understanding of your health and fitness at any given moment. How can they be expected to make such decisions for you?
It'd be a sad world if customers turned up at dive centres to be told that they were "not diving with us" because of some potential symptom that a dive centre employee may, or may not, accurately recognize.
Would the same be expected at a car rental booth? At a fairground attraction? At a gymnasium? Would you expect staff to diagnose medical conditions and restrict customer access to services on that basis?
Furthermore, there is no necessity for medical screening for fun dives. Only courses are covered by this requirement. As a qualified diver, you are educated to dive only when fit and healthy to do so. Safe Diving Practices, which you are taught, reinforce that. That means, YOU make the judgement call. If in doubt YOU make the decision to seek qualified medical advise on the issue, relative to your intention to go diving.
Since ear injuries make up about 1/3 of diving accidents or injuries I really wish the idea of "equalize often" had been stressed more but I also should have apparently been focused on that much more than I did that day and throughout my training.
It's in the manual, the eLearning, the Knowledge Reviews, the quizzes, the exam... it's reinforced in confined water and open water dives.
If the concept didn't sink in, then I don't think the blame can lie with PADI, or the instructors.
Another question to you Deb, in the E-Learning course a lot of time was spent on Dive Planning, Dive Tables and the RDP, why was it not mentioned and why was there no dive planning or any hands on review? Is this SOP? Seriously, I'd like to know.
That's a fair point and something still to be addressed by the dive operator, IMHO. Dive planning is a stated requirement/standard on the dives.
How it is approached may vary from dive center to dive center. I've seen the dive planning given to students as homework on the night prior to diving. I've seen it done in communal groups on the boat or in the classroom. I've also seen instructors who sit back and see if students are pro-active in doing what they've been taught to do. I've seen instructors who do the planning, but brief the students on that planning as part of the pre-dive brief. It varies. I have also seen dive centers that neglect this aspect - where the instructor does the planning and a 'follow me...' approach is used. IMHO, that doesn't empower divers and may not satisfy PADI standards for the dives.
if the E-Learning is so "pathetic" why does PADI offer it at all?
Ker-ching!
I got 100's on most of the tests and 90% on the final. I felt I had learned the basics pretty well.
Did the 10% missed include 'equalizing often'? You stated earlier that this was not taught obviously enough...
My point in starting this forum thread was to warn other newbies like me to be careful who they choose to learn to dive with.
If it were, then I most certainly wouldn't have gotten involved. However, it was very clear that your 'point' was to discourage other divers specifically from using the named dive center, through the act of portraying that dive center as unsafe and unprofessional. Those were misguided accusations on your behalf.
It sounds like in the court of public opinion here, I was the one at fault, should have known better and should have acted more professionally. I accept that.
Scubaboard is a community. People have opinions and experience to share. I think, in general, we see allegations about dive centers as being quite serious - and worthy of investigation. Those involved in this debate have approached it with varying degrees of open-mindedness.
I didn't see you complaining about public opinion when initial threat respondents unquestioningly supported your allegations and leapt into condemnation of this dive center.
Had questions not be raised, nor other witnesses involved, then I seriously suspect you'd have been very satisfied with the thread. As it is, you've learned more, about both the diving aspects and the methods of investigating/raising complaint - and that's a great benefit from being on Scubaboard.
Again, had I known THEN what I know NOW everything, including the method of training I chose, I would have done differently.
Hence my advice to ask questions first, and only make accusations when you are certain of the facts.
I don't see why a mature adult should need to 'learn' the concept that it is unfair to make allegations, without having first ensured that those allegations were correct and reasonable.
..but if you did, then that's a positive result.
