An age-old question: ways to 60m.

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Often the only noticeable difference between educated perception and foolhardy rule-breaking is whether one dies or not. Since not all such acts cause death, it is not a very useful distinction. Those who survive are quite noisy about it, those who don't are pretty quiet. So we hear a lot of noise.
Mate, you definitely need prescription spectacles. I said, "challenge rules" not "break rules".

Again, stop situating the argument to justify your ideological beliefs.
 
Again, stop situating the argument to justify your ideological beliefs.
I've made four posts in this 30-page thread, none of which shift the argument or express any ideology.
Perhaps you meant to respond to someone else?
 
I've made four posts in this 30-page thread, none of which shift the argument or express any ideology.
Perhaps you meant to respond to someone else?
Apologies. I misinterpreted your statement.
 
Nothing wrong with diving on helium at 30 metres if that is what is required to make you safe at that depth.

Conversely if you can function at 200 feet on air despite some narcosis, that is fine.

Horses for courses.
I agree. The people who actually dive deep on air (my definition might be 160 ft +) are a self selecting group.

The divers who feel significant narcosis, feel like they are too compromised aerobically or possibly ones which have not previously demonstrated an adaption to functioning while impaired with recreational drugs are probably NOT going to be doing it :). But It doesn't surprise me that 22,000 deep air dives could be completed without a fatal accident by a select group of organized people.

And what the heck does having a chamber on site matter when you are trying to discrene the safety differences between air and helium? Do you have a chamber on site for all recreational/tech dives with trimix? I just don't follow some of this?
 
.
Do you have a chamber on site for those dives deeper than 100ft?
As a matter of fact yes we did, much all of the time in Asian waters anyway. Next.

Edit. Saw it used a couple of times (and know of others)..............overwhelmingly by divers who had been on gas or CCR. Just sayin'.
 
Often the only noticeable difference between educated perception and foolhardy rule-breaking is whether one dies or not. Since not all such acts cause death, it is not a very useful distinction. Those who survive are quite noisy about it, those who don't are pretty quiet. So we hear a lot of noise.
There is a fine line between badass and dumbass." (Jimmy Chin)
 
I agree. The people who actually dive deep on air (my definition might be 160 ft +) are a self selecting group.

The divers who feel significant narcosis, feel like they are too compromised aerobically or possibly ones which have not previously demonstrated an adaption to functioning while impaired with recreational drugs are probably NOT going to be doing it :). But It doesn't surprise me that 22,000 deep air dives could be completed without a fatal accident by a select group of organized people.

And what the heck does having a chamber on site matter when you are trying to discrene the safety differences between air and helium? Do you have a chamber on site for all recreational/tech dives with trimix? I just don't follow some of this?
This! :rofl3:
Very perceptive. :cheers:

Been meaning to say something along the same lines theme, but you took the words right outta my mouth.
 

Back
Top Bottom