I receive one of the big dive mags because it comes with my professional membership. I would really prefer the membership was optionally $10 cheaper without it. I do however glance at every page so I know the propaganda the typical diver/reader is bombarded with.
The featured article in the May issue is titled Maui & Oahu Insider's Guide. After reading that article, I am wondering if my rebellious college days have negatively affected my memory, so I am asking for some clarification on some of the article's details.
Is the Sea Tiger a former Hawaiian fishing vessel, 168' in length, sitting on a 130' bottom? I thought from my numerous dives there that the sand under the bow was just deeper than 120' and at the stern it is less than that. I also thought it was not a fishing vessel from Hawaii. Rainbow Scuba's site claims 189' long, and sank in '99 (same date as Hawaii Scuba Diving's site). Not related to the article, Oahu Scuba Diving's site claims it was scuttled in '96.
The article states the San Pedro was sunk in '96 and "Although partially collapsed by typhoons that have scoured it over the last decade or so, it remains a picturesque home for turtles and whitetips (sic)." Now I did live in Monterey/Carmel '98-'00, but I thought I would have heard about Oahu moving south of the equator and experiencing more than one typhoon!
The next paragraph contains this sentence; "The company that placed the Sea Tiger no longer uses it as a tour subject, so for the moment at least, divers have it to themselves." While not as egregious as the previous gaffs, that's a little misleading I think.
The Mahi gets it's own section, with this as the second sentence; "Placed on the bottom in '96, the Mahi was turned completely around and partially collapsed by Typhoon Iwa, so it is no longer recommended for penetration (sic)." Since Iwa was in '82, typhoons are in the Southern Hemisphere and the popular penetration passage collapsed in this century, do you think someone working for the mag should proof read/google the articles facts before publishing? The Mahi section ends with, "Nearby lava tubes offer a fascinating and natural setting for a second dive", which seems kind of lame as an insider statement.
Finally, the Corsair also gets it's own section, calling it a "genuine World War II relic." The article states that, "two years after Pearl Harbor (sic), the planes pilot ran out of fuel on approach and ditched into the sea." I was pretty sure it was ditched "two years after World War II ended ('46 not '43) but Rainbow Scuba's site claims '45. The article also states "local divemasters say the pilot (sic) is still alive and living on Molokai." I thought Captain Joe said he lived on Oahu?
OK O'hana, let's hear your opinions/facts!
The featured article in the May issue is titled Maui & Oahu Insider's Guide. After reading that article, I am wondering if my rebellious college days have negatively affected my memory, so I am asking for some clarification on some of the article's details.
Is the Sea Tiger a former Hawaiian fishing vessel, 168' in length, sitting on a 130' bottom? I thought from my numerous dives there that the sand under the bow was just deeper than 120' and at the stern it is less than that. I also thought it was not a fishing vessel from Hawaii. Rainbow Scuba's site claims 189' long, and sank in '99 (same date as Hawaii Scuba Diving's site). Not related to the article, Oahu Scuba Diving's site claims it was scuttled in '96.
The article states the San Pedro was sunk in '96 and "Although partially collapsed by typhoons that have scoured it over the last decade or so, it remains a picturesque home for turtles and whitetips (sic)." Now I did live in Monterey/Carmel '98-'00, but I thought I would have heard about Oahu moving south of the equator and experiencing more than one typhoon!
The next paragraph contains this sentence; "The company that placed the Sea Tiger no longer uses it as a tour subject, so for the moment at least, divers have it to themselves." While not as egregious as the previous gaffs, that's a little misleading I think.
The Mahi gets it's own section, with this as the second sentence; "Placed on the bottom in '96, the Mahi was turned completely around and partially collapsed by Typhoon Iwa, so it is no longer recommended for penetration (sic)." Since Iwa was in '82, typhoons are in the Southern Hemisphere and the popular penetration passage collapsed in this century, do you think someone working for the mag should proof read/google the articles facts before publishing? The Mahi section ends with, "Nearby lava tubes offer a fascinating and natural setting for a second dive", which seems kind of lame as an insider statement.
Finally, the Corsair also gets it's own section, calling it a "genuine World War II relic." The article states that, "two years after Pearl Harbor (sic), the planes pilot ran out of fuel on approach and ditched into the sea." I was pretty sure it was ditched "two years after World War II ended ('46 not '43) but Rainbow Scuba's site claims '45. The article also states "local divemasters say the pilot (sic) is still alive and living on Molokai." I thought Captain Joe said he lived on Oahu?
OK O'hana, let's hear your opinions/facts!
